The Editorial Page of THEDEADPELICAN.COM



Home Account Search
...but it was Just a Fling! It Meant Nothing to me, I Swear!

Let's  turn back the clock, shall we, to a few years ago.

Nearly every conservative pundit and talking head is  enthralled with Senator  Joe Lieberman . They just can't say enough great things about him and his "independent mindedness" in supporting the Iraq War.

This blogger (in private, not online)  is taking every opportunity to remind people of the reality of   Joe Lieberman. Simply put, he's an ultra- liberal who happens to have been a supporter of the Iraq War and the overthrow of Saddam Hussein.

He's pro-choice, against tax cuts, has voted against conservative judges, is against gun rights... basically, he has done everything possible to thwart the conservative agenda during his tenure.

But nobody wanted to hear it. They were too busy enjoying their little ideological infidelity with a staunch member of the left.

Well, it has come back to bite them. Joe is now confirmed as a speaker at the Republican National Convention, and is a contender for John McCain's running mate.

I expected Limbaugh and Hannity  to be thrilled about this  but oh, no... after creating the idea that  Joe Lieberman is one of us, the prospect of him as VP has them running  scared. Amazingly, I heard them both saying that if   Lieberman is McCain's running mate, McCain will lose.

Well, duh!

I guess whatever happened between Joe and some members of the right wasn't love after all- just a fling.
Packing it in...
Folks, I think I'm going to have to pack it in.

Why?

 Because one day I might  wake up to update THE DEAD PELICAN and discover that the internet isn't there. And even if it is there, it  will take many hours to get it set up properly.

No, I'm not crazy.

Well,  actually I am, but it has nothing to do with this  post.

I figure if that kind of logic works in the offshore drilling debate, it works for me.

From the Lafayette Advertiser:

Companies may not drill at all if they don't believe there are enough oil and gas deposits to justify the huge upfront costs involved in setting up drill platforms, laying underwater pipelines and other infrastructure, experts say.

That means the economic benefits of drilling - increased supply of oil and natural gas, lower prices at the gas pump, smaller utility bills and potentially thousands of new energy-related jobs - are years away from materializing, if at al

What they're saying that is the strain on your budget won't be relieved because there's too much  risk involved, it will take time, and it may not even work.

Hell, that's true of what I do... what you do... so let's just QUIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

NOTE: For those of you who are slow to catch on, this is called  sarcasm.

McCain Adds Deficit Hawk to his Team
It's been too long since I've ranted. Sorry about that.

I had some domain name issues with "rogersrants.com." (Translation: it expired. Go ahead, laugh it up.)

But they have been resolved, so on with the commentary.

I've challenged Senator McCain. However, a bright spot has occurred in his candidacy that I can give him credit for.  He's added what direct mail pioneer Richard Viguerie calls a "deficit hawk" to his team. See press release from below.


Richard Viguerie Praises McCain for
Embrace of Deficit Hawk David Walker

            (Manassas, Virginia) Richard A. Viguerie, Chairman of ConservativeHQ.com, praised Senator John McCain for indicating that he would tap former U.S. Comptroller David Walker to help balance the federal budget. In a statement, Viguerie said:

            “Senator McCain has sent a clear signal that he would seek to end the massive deficits that have occurred during the Bush Administration and the last 10 years that the Republicans controlled Congress.

            “Under George W. Bush, Dennis Hastert, Tom DeLay, Bill Frist, and Ted Stevens, the Republican Party was transformed from the party of fiscal responsibility to the party of spend and spend, elect and elect. John McCain may very well be serious in wanting the GOP to return to its ideological roots.

            “At the end of July 2008, the national debt stood at $9.58 Trillion, of which $2.36 Trillion was owed to the Social Security Trust Fund.

            “For Fiscal Year 2009, the national debt is projected to increase another $825 Billion, including $227 Billion to be borrowed from Social Security.

            “This insanity must stop. Senator McCain’s embrace of deficit hawk David Walker is a strong indicator to conservatives and independents that he intends to try to do something to stop these irresponsible deficits.

            “I might note that David Walker has also talked with the fiscal advisers of Senator Barack Obama, so perhaps there is something hopeful in that as well. After all, Walker was appointed head of the General Accounting Office (GAO) by President Clinton and was appointed as Assistant Secretary of Labor by President Reagan.

            “Republicans and Democrats should be able to agree that the annual budget deficits are unconscionable and that the cumulative national debt threatens our children’s future.”


John McCain: Don't Say I Didn't Warn You
Back when  I was an enthusiastic (as opposed to grudging or ambivalent) supporter of Republicans in general, there were many motivating factors. The first one was that I believed the concept of "limited government" had a fighting chance when Republicans were running the show.

Somewhere between 1994 and 2008, that hope was dashed to pieces.

In days past, I had one big beef with  Democrats. They had a  seeming refusal to take blame for their own failures. It was never their fault for being out of touch with voters. When  Democrats were losing election after election, it was always  the fault of  American voters who were racist, greedy, intolerant, blah blah blah.

Losers pointing the finger at voters is a sure sign of a party's political terminal illness.


And now we're seeing it from Republicans. Former Senator Phil Gramm recently said:

"You've heard of mental depression; this is a mental recession," he said, noting that growth has held up at about 1 percent despite all the publicity over losing jobs to India, China, illegal immigration, housing and credit problems and record oil prices. "We may have a recession; we haven't had one yet."

"We have sort of become a nation of whiners," he said. "You just hear this constant whining, complaining about a loss of competitiveness, America in decline"

Phil Gramm is presidential candidate John McCain's economic adviser.

When someone in politics starts talking about the American people being mentally deranged, you can rest assured that the person's  party, candidate, etc. are in serious trouble. For proof, just look at Jimmy Carter.

Gramm's talk echoes Jimmy Carters' "crisis of confidence" rhetoric. In the Carter Era, America was suffering from inflation and energy problems  due to Carter's  failed economic and energy policies. Did he accept blame and admit the error of his ways?

Nope.

 Carter basically said that it was the fault of the people, who suffered from a collective psychological disorder, called a "crisis of confidence."

The American people responded by routing him in 1980, and nominating Ronald Reagan as their president.

Like Carter, the McCain Camp and those of his party are pointing their fingers at voters.  They sense that Americans are rejecting the G.O.P. Indeed, the party stands to lose even more congressional seats in '08.

But there is no catharsis, no self- examination. Because in the minds of Gramm and many G.O.P. supporters,  the problems lies "out there."  Americans are lazy, have an entitlement mentality, etc.

This kind of "passing the buck" often is precursor for disaster for whoever does the finger- pointing. In this case, it's the McCain camp and his party.

 Newt Gingrich Warned you

I warned you.

As they say, "I hate to say I told you so,"   but....
 

High Gas Prices: The Hard Questions That Aren't Being Asked
At one time, I could have accurately been described as a "libertarian." I believed in things like open borders and so-called "free trade." I really believed that free-trade was not a "zero-sum game," where one party can only benefit if the other loses.

What happened?

Well, reality doesn't seem to be conforming to this business of globalization and free-trade being a "win-win" situation. The latest question concerns the skyrocketing price of gas.

Democrats often blame greedy oil companies, Republicans blame environmentalists who don't want to drill at Anwar (which has some truth to it).

But what's REALLY driving up gas prices? Increased demand from "developing nations" like India and China:

We know there’s explosive demand growth in the developing world with no easy way to turn this train around. More than a billion consumers are moving up into a higher level of consumption, demanding the comforts the West has enjoyed since the third Industrial Revolution that began in the early 1900s.

For many decades now, 1billion of the earth’s human inhabitants have consumed two-thirds of the earth’s developed resources. The other 6 billion got by on the remaining third. Now, led by China and India, the developing world is eating better and living better. And this requires massive commodity consumption, with oil topping the list.


India is one of the main countries that America "outsources" to. Whenever you have trouble with your Dell laptop computer and you are forced to call that dreaded "help desk," chances are good that you are going to be talking to someone in India.   American companies are off-shoring jobs to India, creating tons of jobs over there and raising the standard of living. As a result, they are more able to afford things like cars and the gas that powers them:    gas prices are  skyrocketing. And Americans are struggling financially as a result. In short, their gain has led to our loss.

And if you pay attention to where most of the stuff you buy at Walmart is made, you'll see a "made in China" label. People over there in China are getting  paid to make the stuff sold in American stores. They are making money off of us. Since we opened our doors to trade with China, their standard of living has gone up, and China is consuming more precious energy resources and driving up demand for them.

One of the arguments favoring the off-shoring of American jobs is that it helps poor people in developing countries. Indeed it does. And true to the concept of socialism, it does so at the expense of others (that's Americans). 

And to make matters worse, the increased emissions in these "developing countries" is raising the specter of international regulatory agencies. In other words, bigger, more intrusive  government. 

 So this is what a "win-win" situation looks like.


Thank You Louisiana
Thanks  to everyone who called their legislators, emailed the governor, held up portest signs, and did any number of things that stopped this ridiculous pay raise from happening.

A guarded measure of credit goes to Governor Jindal as well. Though he wavered here and there, if nothing else he was responsive to the voice of the angry masses.

God bless Louisiana.

--Chad  E. Rogers
Jindal Can Veto the Pay Raise or Kiss it Goodbye
I've been trying to find the best way to say this for hours now, and I think I've found it.

If nothing else, I'm sure Mr. Jindal can be counted on to look after his own narrow, selfish interest (like any politician).

I don't count him to do what's in the best interest of Louisiana, but I think I can count on him to look after his own hide- if he knows what's good for it.

And I'm not sure that he does know right now.

But if he's interested in saving his career, then he will veto the legislative pay raise proposal.

If he doesn't veto this bill, he can kiss it all goodbye.

That's not a threat. Influential as I may be, I don't have the power to single-handedly take him down, and I don't really know that I  would want to.

But there are others who will go out of their way to destroy him if he doesn't veto this thing and they will likely succeed.

Your move, Bobby.


Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Chameleon
rep86.jpg

When I think of House Speaker Jim Tucker, I think of these lyrics to the  song "Karma Chameleon" by the band Culture Club:

If I listen to your lies would you say
Im a man without conviction
Im a man who doesn't know
How to sell a contradiction
You come and go
You come and go

Karma karma karma karma karma chameleon
You come and go
You come and go

How  perfect in describing Republican House Speaker Jim Tucker. For he is indeed a man with no apparent conviction, who is trying to  sell a contradiction. The contradiction is that he has  paraded himself as both a fiscal conservative who demands responsible spending, and a man who joyfully praises a left-leaning Democrat for sponsoring a bill that increases legislators' pay and thereby increases government spending.

Apparently, Tucker is against any increase in government spending that does not suit his own narrow selfish interest.

First, he cloaks himself as a fiscal conservative, standing up to governor Jindal for busting the spending cap in a previous session. The great lie here is that because Tucker is willing to stand up to his own governor who is in his own party, he must indeed be a man of principle when it comes to fiscal responsibility.  

Fast forward to today when I saw him, with my own eyes, gushing over Anne Duplesis' bill raising legislators pay. Tucker endlessly droned on and on how what a great leader Duplesis was for doing that which he himself has fought against in the past:  increasing government spending,.

He also took the time to take a stab at bloggers who had the gall to post a photo of Anne Duplesis' Mercedes.  Duplesis is a Democrat who had sponsored a bill whose goal was to increase government spending, which makes  Tucker's praise for her downright sickening.

The good news is that the public has grown tired of  being mocked by this man and he  now has  a permanent target on his  back.  People like my friend Moon Griffon are already calling on Tucker to be replaced as house speaker, and people I talk to say that this could actually happen within the year.

No matter what Tucker's fate is  as house speaker, he will be shown no mercy here.
Et tu, Bobby?


Governor Jindal has said that he is against the proposed pay hike for lawmakers, at least in principal. However, he doesn't seem intent on vetoing it:

Jindal said he wouldn't veto the pay raise if it gets to his desk, saying he didn't want to give lawmakers a reason to jettison any of his outstanding legislation. He wouldn't say, however, whether lawmakers had threatened to spike any of his bills if he intervened in the pay-raise debate.


The governor needs to realize that  this isn't 1988- it's 2008.  There's a much stronger nucleus of conserative, grass roots support. The blogosphere, talk radio, and a variety of burgeoning grass roots organizations are calling on Jindal to do the right thing and veto this pay raise. Numerous columnists have also come out against the pay raise.

Speaking as a member of the alternative media, I have been hopeful, yet skeptical of the governor's sincerity about reform and limited government.  I know that there are countless others who feel the exact same way who run operations similar to mine.

Jindal needs the support of those who have fought the longest and the hardest for reform in this state.

 If he vetoes the pay raise,  he will be the hero of the day and 90% of the ambivalence toward him will vanish. For my part, if he vetos this bill he will have much more enthusiastic support.  I know he will.

If he fails to veto this bill and allows it to become law, the consequences will be disastrous, for his future and to the future of this state.  Among the ranks of reformers I have spoken to, a kind of despair is already setting in. It is painfully clear that if Mr. Jindal doesn't take a stand on this, the  hopes reformers (most of whom have worked longer and harder than I) will be dashed and many of us will acknowledge permanent defeat.

It will be considered nothing less than treason, a knife plunged into the heart of anyone who had hopes for Jindal as a reformer. If the legislators get a raise, Jindal will have left them for dead crying "Et tu, Bobby?"


These are the stakes.



An Open Letter to Lawmakers Supporting Pay Raises

Dear Ladies and Gentleman of the Legislature:

Go to hell.

Love and kisses,

Chad E. Rogers
Publisher
THE DEAD PELICAN and ROGERS RANTS

P.S. Legislators not supporting pay raises are excluded from THE DEAD PELICAN'S all expense paid trip to hell.

 

I Will be Your Villain, Baby...
Note: The following is a bit tongue-in-cheek.

Below is an anonymous email I got yesterday.


ANONYMOUS EMAILER: My god (Chad), you are the creepiest mother-f#@ker ever.


CHAD'S RESPONSE (borrowing heavily from Samuel L. Jackson in the movie Unbreakable): You know what the creepiest thing is? To not know your place in this world. That's just... that's just an awful feeling.

I almost gave up hope. There were so many times I questioned myself... so many sacrifices, just to find you.

But I found you. I finally found you.

Now that we know who you are... I know who I am. I'm not a mistake!

It all makes sense. In a comic, you know how you can tell who the arch-villain's going to be? He's the exact opposite of the hero, and most time's they're friends, like you and me. I should've known way back when. You know why? Because of the kids. They called me "Bad Chad."

Is Jindal "Limited Government" After All?
Sure, there's been some suspicion about Governor Jindal's conservatism. Many argue  that he hasn't been hawkish enough on tax cuts, and doesn't want to cut government spending. My assessment to date is that these observations aren't completely wrong, but an article in today's Times Picayune demonstrates that they aren't completely right either.

The fact that council members are griping about not getting their fair share of pork leads me to suspect that Mr. Jindal is doing something right:

Council members griped about how Jindal's administration has dashed Jefferson's legislative wish list of late. They criticized his crew for not initially honoring an agreement with the New Orleans Public Belt Railroad crucial to the Huey P. Long Bridge expansion and for giving the populous parish short shrift when doling out the capital outlay budget to fix roads.

The council's third beef was over a hospital-financing bill that would reimburse public hospitals like West Jefferson Medical Center and East Jefferson General Hospital for treating uninsured patients.

The bottom line here is that someone isn't getting what they think is the fair share of our tax dollars.

The typical Louisiana way of thinking seems to be  "My parish's  pork barrel projects are life and death- but in any other parish, it's called "waste" and/ or "big government."

This could be  why Jindal is criticized for both expanding government and  cutting government.

No one can accuse me of being a Jindal sycophant. I have challenged him and will continue to as I see fit.

But   clearly some people are angry because they haven't gotten to gorge themselves at the public trough, which forces me to believe that while Jindal certainly isn't doing everything right, he's not doing everything wrong either.

And I haven't dispensed with all of my skepticism- the title of this blog is in the form of a question- not an answer.